A Case of Why WI Voters Should Show ID

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

Did you forget to mention that the so called impartial judge that granted this injuction signed a recall petition against walker. So much for being impartial. But why report all the facts but just for your info

So? You say the judge cannot follow the law and enjoy his legal rights as a citizen? And do something that is not disqualifying from the case under our legal system?

And instead of making this a personal attack against me, and accusing me falsely of withholding information (which is absurd, as all I did was quote two news stories) why don't you just post the info you want added to the discussion? Why do you angry zealots always have to make things personal attacks? Your anger and hate and personalization of opposition into personalized hate for "the opposite side" is the problem with everything wrong in this country's government right now.

Wow, you guys really have zero respect for the law, don't you?

Please, go ahead and show how that affected the rule of law. Do you not realize the trial is April 16?

Let me get some popcorn while the Walkerites and their acolytes twist themselves into pretzels in an effort to decry "judicial activism" and institute personal smears, with their massively hypocritical history of Judge Prosser

Actually, the utter disrespect shown for the law in Wisconsin isn't funny at all. It's pathetic and sad. Face it: the voter ID law is under injunction -meaning it cannot be used in the April election - until the trial.

I have to go check Intrade, see the current odds on "recall vs perp walk" happening first for Scott Walker.