|
|
 |
|
#6
12-14-2011, 07:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
perhaps they could hire more workers and not pay ot? but that would mean more pensions, more health care expense, workers comp insurance....
it's cheaper to pay someone ot than to hire more employees. that's a fact, and explains why many companies are doing the same work with less people. the people getting ot might not like it, not everyone wants to work over 40. but in the current climate, people aren't complaining much. they're happy to be working at all. so yeah, when someone says in a headline 'toll workers raking it in' it sounds wasteful. but is it? as an aside, perhaps the govt could look at ways to take some hiring burdens away? they've cut the payroll tax to employees, but not employers.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln 
|
Threaded Mode