Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
Duh Truth---I looked at Rachel's historic 2009 campaign LAST YEAR .
Very spiffy . And deserving of its reward .
For some reason Rachelistas can't get over 2009 a year later . And yes, you did say the topic was Rachel's next race, not last year's races ... Off topic ..
Her campaign this year is somewhat less historic--in particular this faux race coming up .
You can spin that all you want, but this Monmouth endeavor is historic only in its absurdity .
Time to look forward and get the shades of delusion off .
If this campaign was run by any other horse, they would be laughed at for Breeder's Cup potential, and even more so as a potential candidate for HOY .
|
someone with a realistic outlook. i don't even understand the argument, seeing that i'm not a bandwagon jumper. so, i won't even mention names....just the facts. one horse is doing really well, the other is not. one horse shipped in (oaklawn) ready to run for 5 million......on dirt, the other did not. one horse is knocking down grade 1's, the other is running in some ridiculous set up race. one horse will be at the BC classic...on dirt, if all is well. from the schedule of the other horse....well, i'll believe it when i see it.....its so painfully obvious....its not even funny. i hope the race happens and i get to bet it because if the odds are even close...its free money........lol. i could care less about the rachelist or the zentards.. i care about the reality of who is winning and who is not...when i bet. this is 2010, not 2009....throw last years forms out and its not even close.
07-22-2010, 06:26 AM
Threaded Mode