![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I'm coming around to Sidney's Candy. Every year after 2007, I tell myself that I'm not going to get suckered into betting horses who prep on poly, but after the way Line of David ran in Arkansas, and even Lookin at Lucky in the Rebel, I dont' see any reason why Sidney's Candy can't win this thing. He's way more likely than 75 percent of the field.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() A sealed race track--IF that is what he gets--may suit him.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm loving how many people are getting onto Sidney's Candy. I'll be here to eat a big pile of crow if he loses.
NT |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Why would you eat crow if he loses ?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I started this thread to ask people what they liked about this horse. I think he's shaping up as a Saarlandesque underlay and have serious reservations about him making an impact on this race at any point in time.
Assuming that he's going to rate is dangerous. Assuming that he's going to get the lead is even more dangerous. Assuming that he's going to be able to endure a very wide trip a la Big Brown and still be victorious is crazy in my opinion. I find his ability to be effective from off the pace non-existent and think that everyone being dazzled by his fast 3rd quarter of the SA Derby is ignoring the fact that he walked on the lead prior to that point. I'm a big boy and if I'm wrong it won't be the first time and it certainly won't be the last. NT |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I think he'll run Gayego's Kentucky Derby.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
To me, the Derby is just another race --- one of 20 or 30 that I'll play on Saturday. Going to play my usual 2 number exotic and go on with it. I'm using SC because I think he's the best horse in the race. Will he be value? It depends on how you look at it. If you don't think much of LaL and that one is the chalk, with SC being 2nd choice, then he's value. He's value because there's really nothing in the race. SC doesn't have to be a super horse to win. Talamo only needs to work out an efficient trip for him -- one which doesn't contribute to the race collapsing. If I think that the race will collapse, then I need to play MULTIPLE numbers. This is really not the way to make money in the long run. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If you like Sidney's Candy , I would recommend watching the 2nd race at Santa Anita on 12/30/09, Sidney missed the break, tried to rate behind the leaders, made a 3-wide menacing move on the turn and flattened out. If he can't rate successfully at 3-5 in a 6 furlong race it's hard to imagine him doing it successfully at 1 1/4 miles from the extreme outside post. He just hasn't shown a willingness to pass horses.
|