![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But when their gov't became involved, it unleveled the playing field. We, in MD, lost horsemen, horses and jocks (Dominguez, Pino, etc) to Delpark and others to CT. As things worsened in MD, I began relying on the insane purses at CT and Delpark to keep my partnerships solvent. Was the business model CT employed where I could run my $5k claimer for $23k purse a wonderful thing? No, it was stupid. But 2 wins at CT in the summer made enough money for my group to ensure that we could survive the rest of the year. We had the opportunity to vote for/against slots in MD this past Nov. Understand that as much as I hate slots, the fact was that in order to compete, MD has to have the same business tools that CT and Delpark, and now Philly/PennNat have. And, currently, KY needs the same as Indiana has. While it seems pretty pathetic to even mention Indiana racing in the same breath as KY racing, the reality is KY needs to level the playing field that slots will allow. In a perfect racing world, slots would not be part of any track's equation. The upset of the apple cart, in the Mid-Atlantic, was when the lesser tracks received the golden goose of slots. It appears to me that, in your racing Utopia, there'd only be stakes races. But the reality is no one wants to run two races a day, twice a week. As the good Dr. pointed out, without the benefit of a timer or designation of a class level, most of us wouldn't know the difference between 4 horses in a $5k claimer spread across the track at the wire running 6f in 1:13 vs. 4 spread running in a Grade II going 6f in 1:09. It's all about the competition no matter the level and whether you've got the horse to win at that level. |