Big Brown and Winstrol....questions

Originally Posted by ELA

What do I mean -- what I mean is that it has nothing to do with DWL. There are plenty of companies that will insure his horses -- period. The issue is that I said a claim was made that said "ALL" and you commented on it by saying "SOME" -- I didn't see you responde to that. Obviously, if companies will insure his horses than it has nothing to do with DWL.

I would also look to have a company decline coverage, put in writing that they are declining coverage because the horse is trained by DWL. We've all heard the so called "claims" that he has higher %'s of breakdowns -- yeah, more "claims". Proof would be nice. Also, what kind of BS insurance are we talking about here. Breakdowns? How about mortality.

Like I said, nonsense and BS. Let's all get together and call insurance companies -- not brokers -- and we can come back here and celebrate that DWL can't get insurance from ALL insurance companies.

Carry on.

Eric

How about this.

Is there a indication that a horse is less likely to
be insured under D.wayne than other top trainers?

I am assuming DWL is still considered a top trainer
even though his barn is much smaller than in the past.

[ELA]

Originally Posted by pgardn

How about this.

Is there a indication that a horse is less likely to
be insured under D.wayne than other top trainers?

I am assuming DWL is still considered a top trainer
even though his barn is much smaller than in the past.

I don't know. Is it possible? Sure. Is it probable? I would say no. Also, you would probably get a lot of arguements from people regarding DWL still being considered a top trainer, LOL.

This is a larger discussion, but when we talk about DWL, we all know the reality of what and who we are talking about.

Eric