War Pass --DB ?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi

No, Narcissus thought he was Adonis and drowned when he saw that his reflection was really that of an ugly hillbilly.

Either that, or Narcissus was the Greek name for Adonis...or maybe he was Adonis' boyfriend.

I'm not really sure, but I'm getting reports recently that Moses was high on hallucinogens when he wrote all this sh!t down on the Dead Sea Scrolls.

lol

it's been a while since i've read my bulfinch, so you're probably right about all that.

[Danzig]

http://horseracing.sportsline.com/cb...rticleId=26129

zito speaks out in the above about war pass...but it also has updates on several other horses heading down the derby trail.

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by Danzig

http://horseracing.sportsline.com/cb...rticleId=26129

zito speaks out in the above about war pass...but it also has updates on several other horses heading down the derby trail.

it really bothers me that a horse pays $76 to show and the trifecta isn't even tax money. Either some very smart people or someone knew that War Pass wasn't going to run 4th. The super didn't pay a whole helluva lot.

yet Zito found nothing run at all.

the horse is just one of those favorites that has to have absolutely everything go their way or they throw in the towel.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

it really bothers me that a horse pays $76 to show and the trifecta isn't even tax money. Either some very smart people or someone knew that War Pass wasn't going to run 4th. The super didn't pay a whole helluva lot.

yet Zito found nothing run at all.

the horse is just one of those favorites that has to have absolutely everything go their way or they throw in the towel.

I think the main reason for this is the number of horses and the number of true contenders in the race. You can easily make a case that only 3 horses had a shot in this race for win and place. A 3x3 x All 1.00 tri cost 30 bucks not alot for a low risk wager. As far as the Super a 3 x 3 x All x All cost 120 for a buck and 12.00 for a dime. I'm sure a lot of Dime players canibalized the pot. IMHO Supers are paying way less since dime Supers came into play of course I will get an argument but have no way of backing up my claim since I don't have the data to compare. It is simply my observation.

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by jms62

I think the main reason for this is the number of horses and the number of true contenders in the race. You can easily make a case that only 3 horses had a shot in this race for win and place. A 3x3 x All 1.00 tri cost 30 bucks not alot for a low risk wager. As far as the Super a 3 x 3 x All x All cost 120 for a buck and 12.00 for a dime. I'm sure a lot of Dime players canibalized the pot. IMHO Supers are paying way less since dime Supers came into play of course I will get an argument but have no way of backing up my claim since I don't have the data to compare. It is simply my observation.

the one thing you don't get with dimes is the *ALL* payoffs, that you used to see often. There are still monster payoffs just not as often. But racing is helped with the dimes. They get more handle and therefore more percentages. People wouldn't try if they had to spend the $24 everytime
but $2.40
not a problem