Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Danzig188
lol....
sure. of course had his time been a bit faster than hesanoldsalt rather than a bit slower, you'd have been posting that for all to see.
|
So is your point that Salt is better than Bernardini? The Jim Dandy was run on a sloppy track and the allowance was run on a good track, not to mention that Bernardini was never once asked for anything.
It's amazing that this horse went off at 3/5 with all the skeptics out there. Nothing this horse does is good enough. Every one of his wins has to have qualifiers attached to it - he beat tired horses, he loved the slop, he beat nothing. Why is it only Bernardini's races that are looked at under a microscope?
I'm sorry that there are those who simply can not concede that this is a very good horse without adding "but" to it.
07-29-2006, 07:22 PM
Threaded Mode