![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
pamplemousse would never have gotten 10 furlongs on the dirt. He wouldn't get 9 furlongs at Keeneland either.
He was a talented horse who could control the pace and whose aptitude for turf was carrying him farther than his genetic ability over that pro-ride surface. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I base opinion on the following his conduit mare stamina index is extremely poor. Worse than nearly all 2009 derby contenders, and worse than any derby winner in at least the last 30 years my observation that horses who like the pro-ride surface can race and train at longer distances than they normally could -related that Pamplemousse has good breeding for a turf sprinter, and he has a high knee action in his stride which also hints that he likes turf. Being by Kafwain probably doesn't help, I'm not too sire oriented but it probably isn't a big positive I think he would be fine on dirt, just that he would quit after a mile or so |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Barbaro had the best conduit mare stamina index of any Derby winner in at least the last 37 years. Barbaro had proven himself over real turf to get the distance. Barbaro didn't run on the pro ride ride surface, potentially masking his distance deficiencies. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I actually noticed a horse at Keeneland doing that the other day. He won by 5.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I should be working...but I'm wasting my time on this board. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|