Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-22-2008, 10:12 PM
jwkniska's Avatar
jwkniska jwkniska is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mt. Prospect, IL (AP)
Posts: 1,578
Default this is a shocker....

Quick-Pick under Scrutiny A computer glitch that invalidated hundreds, possibly thousands of bets has brought Scientific Games beneath the spotlight of the California Horse Racing Board, which learned of the matter on May 7, although its probe was not disclosed until last Sunday. The story has now been picked up by various California news outlets, although the San Jose Mercury News has the best rundown of the situation.

The problem was uncovered by a bettor at San Mateo's Bay Meadows track who placed 1,300 $1 superfecta bets on the Kentucky Derby, using Scientific's randomizing software. However, not one of the 1,300 tickets listed eventual winner Big Brown. Seems Scientific's "quick-pick" function had been routinely omitting the last-numbered horse in the Derby and other races (Big Brown was #20). This isn't Scientific's first brush with notoriety: In 2002, an employee of Scientific subsidiary Autotote pled guilty to an attempted pick-six fix of the Breeders' Cup, a scam that -- had it been successful -- would have netted $3 million
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-22-2008, 10:19 PM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwkniska
Quick-Pick under Scrutiny A computer glitch that invalidated hundreds, possibly thousands of bets has brought Scientific Games beneath the spotlight of the California Horse Racing Board, which learned of the matter on May 7, although its probe was not disclosed until last Sunday. The story has now been picked up by various California news outlets, although the San Jose Mercury News has the best rundown of the situation.

The problem was uncovered by a bettor at San Mateo's Bay Meadows track who placed 1,300 $1 superfecta bets on the Kentucky Derby, using Scientific's randomizing software. However, not one of the 1,300 tickets listed eventual winner Big Brown. Seems Scientific's "quick-pick" function had been routinely omitting the last-numbered horse in the Derby and other races (Big Brown was #20). This isn't Scientific's first brush with notoriety: In 2002, an employee of Scientific subsidiary Autotote pled guilty to an attempted pick-six fix of the Breeders' Cup, a scam that -- had it been successful -- would have netted $3 million
i think the bigger story is the one about retards betting $1300 on random numbers.

just when i start to think i'm too cynical about human nature, i find out i'm actually too optimistic.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-22-2008, 10:24 PM
jwkniska's Avatar
jwkniska jwkniska is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mt. Prospect, IL (AP)
Posts: 1,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hi_im_god
i think the bigger story is the one about retards betting $1300 on random numbers.

just when i start to think i'm too cynical about human nature, i find out i'm actually too optimistic.

can you say...... lottery ticket???????

I love it when people put dumb $$ into pools like this... makes my mouth water!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-22-2008, 10:31 PM
justindew's Avatar
justindew justindew is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,640
Default

He could have keyed Big Brown on top and still not had it with 1300 combinations. Or even 5000 combinations.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-22-2008, 11:32 PM
VOL JACK's Avatar
VOL JACK VOL JACK is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: @VOLJACK79
Posts: 2,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justindew
He could have keyed Big Brown on top and still not had it with 1300 combinations. Or even 5000 combinations.
Wow, I thought I was dumb for not hedging my BB-DoC exacta with a BB- ALL-DoC trifecta.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-23-2008, 12:42 AM
hockey2315 hockey2315 is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VOL JACK
Wow, I thought I was dumb for not hedging my BB-DoC exacta with a BB- ALL-DoC trifecta.
Glad I wasn't the only one. . .
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-23-2008, 12:45 AM
10 pnt move up's Avatar
10 pnt move up 10 pnt move up is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,745
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hi_im_god
i think the bigger story is the one about retards betting $1300 on random numbers.

just when i start to think i'm too cynical about human nature, i find out i'm actually too optimistic.
I don't get this line of thinking....yes we should discourage (and saying its idiocy certainly does) all forms of uninformed money from trying to get "lucky" betting on horses. This certainly helps us compete against each other and make money.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-23-2008, 04:34 AM
3kings's Avatar
3kings 3kings is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up
I don't get this line of thinking....yes we should discourage (and saying its idiocy certainly does) all forms of uninformed money from trying to get "lucky" betting on horses. This certainly helps us compete against each other and make money.
In Gods defense(not that he needs it), I think we can assume that that most of the people on a horse racing board are not spending $1300. on random selections. Therefore he is not discouraging anyone, just making a comment on the lottery mentality.

Last edited by 3kings : 05-23-2008 at 04:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.