#1
|
|||
|
|||
7/23 (SAR): Schuylerville S. (G3), James Marvin
8th (4:55) James Marvin S.
7 Furlongs | Open | 3 Year Olds And Up Stakes | Purse: $75,000 1 You and I Forever Lezcano J 123 L 2 Cool Coal Man Velazquez J R 123 L 3 Half Metal Jacket Dominguez R A 121 L 4 Vineyard Haven Garcia Alan 121 L 5 Discreet Treasure Velasquez C 121 L 6 Friesan Fire Bridgmohan S X 121 L 7 Le Grand Cru Gomez G K 123 L 8 Flat Bold Maragh R 119 L 9 Atoned Albarado R J 121 L 10 Silver Edition Borel C H 121 L 9th (5:30) Schuylerville S. (G3) 6 Furlongs | Fillies | 2 Year Olds Stakes | Purse: $100,000 2 Stopspendingmaria Velazquez J R 119 L 3 Le Mi Geaux Lenclud F 119 L 4 Let's Get Fiscal Garcia Alan 119 L 1 Spa Sunrise Coa E M 119 L 5 Dos Lunas Court J K 119 L 6 Show Me the Bling Leparoux J R 119 L 1a Final Mesa Coa E M 121 L A-Coupled: Spa Sunrise and Final Mesa Last edited by Kasept : 07-20-2010 at 04:26 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
<-Coupled: Spa Sunrise and Final Mesa>
I thought they did away with coupling of entries, or is that just in certain instances? |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Same owner I'm guessing.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Was it as far as them both running though? In this instance Spa Sunrise will scratch.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I thought it was same trainer, different owners?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Only same trainer/different owner entries were eliminated. Same trainer/same owner still creates an entry.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Incorrect. The new entry rule has nothing to do with whether or not they both run.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I realize that now, I read your above post. Thank you for taking the time to call me out though, it is truly MUCH APPRECIATED.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Call you out? I'm trying to help.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I know, and I was Thanking You.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
You two need to get a room for some sweet lovin.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I have dinner plans with Scav's mom unfortunately.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Why run both the James Marvin and the Vanderbilt?
__________________
RIP Monroe. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Easy.....
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
It's 16 days apart... in the old (10 years ago) days that would have been perfect for a prep... hopefully some of these come back in the Vandy.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
The Marvin is a 7F race, with many layoff or turnback horses. Aside from a race-ready Vineyard Haven, I'm hard-pressed to identify a single horse in this race that would be a candidate for the 6F Vanderbilt.
PJ Campo has run some duplicative overnight stakes up here the past few years that make you scratch your head (Curlin/Jim Dandy and a listed stakes for 3YO filly sprinters on the Test undercard, by way of example), but this has a far different feel. Last year, the 1-2 finishers in the race were Pyro and Gold Trippi, hardly Vanderbilt candidates at the time. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
The Vanderbilt has been a the local prep for the Forego at 7f on closing weekend. As happened last year, this race will probably send more to the Forego than the Vanderbilt. Have the sprinters become so specialized?
__________________
RIP Monroe. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
3-5 ML on Vineyard Haven? Really.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Friesan Fire might go apesh!t and win this one.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...-schuylerville
congrats to lansdon robbins with his homebred, le mi geaux. first stakes win for first samurai as well.... |