Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 08-16-2011, 01:33 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
"Buffett noted that his federal tax bill, including payroll taxes, came out to just 17.4 percent of his taxable income last year, a lower percentage than anyone else in his office."

Has Buffett just gamed the system? I'd like to know, because I see Republicans shouting all the time about how the rich are already paying a million percent, but it just makes no sense considering our tax revenues.
too many loopholes. I dont understand why the tea party has such a problem with eliminating loopholes.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 08-16-2011, 01:40 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

our next election is going to be like the New York paper's headline when the Jets fired Pete Carroll and hired Rich Kotite.

"Dumb and Dumber"
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 08-16-2011, 01:44 PM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32 View Post
There should be a flat tax with a cut off poverty line. If the top 5% control 70% of the wealth like they do now, they should be paying 70% of the taxes that the US collects.

Warren Buffet paid less of a percentage of income taxes than I did last year. That's ridiculous.
I agree wholeheartedly with a flax tax, no deductions and a poverty cutoff. It's all of those who benefit from the current gi-normous system who defend it. Rich guys who wrote those loopholes, and poor guys who actually get "refunds" in excess of taxes paid, even when taxes paid were zero.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 08-16-2011, 01:45 PM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32 View Post
too many loopholes. I dont understand why the tea party has such a problem with eliminating loopholes.
If you posed the question to Tea Party members of going to a flax tax (instead of closing loopholes) I think you'd get a better response.

The loopholes closed would never be the ones guys like Buffet like. A flat tax instead of the current tax system would be a reset, and by definition would close all loopholes.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 08-16-2011, 02:11 PM
clyde's Avatar
clyde clyde is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Welsh Pride!
Posts: 13,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino View Post
How about none of the above. Obama is the worst of all time but none of these other Bozo's deserve to be president either.
Maybe Clyde should run. He seems to have all the answers and he's a real piece of **** like the rest of these politicians.


^^^^ Just set new speed record in reaching First Degree Ruination,breaking Indian Malarkey's old record.


But when you are easily lost in your own neighborhood,it's understandable.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 08-16-2011, 02:36 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32 View Post
too many loopholes. I dont understand why the tea party has such a problem with eliminating loopholes.
Take a wild guess.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 08-16-2011, 02:51 PM
Clip-Clop Clip-Clop is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manningtown, Colorado
Posts: 2,727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
Take a wild guess.
Because large corporations do not pay taxes, they collect them? Unless you are GE, in which case you just get to keep them.
__________________
don't run out of ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 08-16-2011, 02:59 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
Take a wild guess.
because they are bought out like everyone else in washington?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 08-16-2011, 03:45 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32 View Post
because they are bought out like everyone else in washington?
It's a corporate lobbying platform disguised as a populist revolt.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 08-16-2011, 04:02 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
It's a corporate lobbying platform disguised as a populist revolt.
"What is the Tea Party, sponsored by Dick Armey and Freedom Works."

"I'll take terrorists for $400 now, Alec"
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 08-16-2011, 05:47 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

What is ironic is that Union pension funds have hundreds of billions of dollars invested in stock of many of those very same corporations that they and the lefties never miss a chance to bash.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-16-2011, 06:31 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
there is no way bachmann gets the nom. romney was as close to a lock for that as someone can be until perrry entered the race.

and if things continue as they are now, which i hope doesn't happen, then obama is in for a real battle.
It's "Perry", btw. "Parry" is the fake candidate Stephen Colbert advised Iowa voters to vote for in the straw poll

Perry doesn't stand a chance. Karl Rove already took him down today. The Bushies hate him.

Perry is "big hat, all the jobs I made are at McDonalds, to support the jobs the oil industry brought in that I am taking credit for"
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.