![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm PO'd cause I had the two on top of 1 and 9 for exacta and tri, so the 60:1 3 horse killed all that.
The payoff on the tri does seem low. My only theory is that since the race was absent a big favorite, most tri bettors had spread out much more than normal. Or It was something fishy! The price on the Jerkens/Coa horse was a surprise, The works jumped off of the page. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() 1,2,3 tri box strikes again in the 6th.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Dems my numbas...Dems my numbas!!! |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() "The numbers always repeat themselves" thats my favorite. "That number just ran at Meadows, I knew it was coming at Delta"
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ySSg4QG8g |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The 1-2-3 factor is very big but also all three horses were first time starters. The tri was in line with the exacta but the exacta was probably less than half of what it " should " have paid.
There are odd payoffs all the time. If it makes people feel better I will find out if any unusual betting patterns existed. I doubt it. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|