Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-29-2014, 05:46 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Owners NEVER lose money on pro sports franchises. Whatever they pay won't really matter because teams always appreciate in value.

Kind of makes you think the players union got played during the last lockout when so many owners were crying that they were losing money. The Bucks sold for $550,000,000 with a decrepit arena, no stars in the countries 39th largest market.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-29-2014, 11:30 PM
pointman's Avatar
pointman pointman is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,693
Default

$2 Billion pending approval

http://nypost.com/2014/05/29/steve-b...for-2-billion/

What does this make the Yankees or Cowboys worth?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-30-2014, 12:31 PM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Owners NEVER lose money on pro sports franchises. Whatever they pay won't really matter because teams always appreciate in value.

Kind of makes you think the players union got played during the last lockout when so many owners were crying that they were losing money. The Bucks sold for $550,000,000 with a decrepit arena, no stars in the countries 39th largest market.
A large part of what has driven the price of any franchise's value up has been the preposterous prices cable networks will pay for television rights. We might be seeing tops reached on those and if they stabilize, then so will the value of the franchise.

In L.A., Time Warner paid $7 billion for 25 years of rights to broadcast the Dodgers. They have, so far, been unable to resell the network they created to carry the games to any other provider. They are allegedly asking about $4/subscriber. They probably need close to that to reach break even on the deal they signed.

Absent a deal, most of L.A. can't watch the Dodgers. If your local bar isn't in an area served by Time Warner, you can't go there to watch either.

Dodger ownership gets their sack if cash regardless but they have to think about what happens to a fan base that can't watch any games outside the stadium. And Time Warner may become the cautionary tale for other networks if they wind up taking a loss.

The Clippers current TV contract expires in 2016.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-30-2014, 02:36 PM
Dawgswin's Avatar
Dawgswin Dawgswin is offline
Sunshine Park
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 80
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Owners NEVER lose money on pro sports franchises. Whatever they pay won't really matter because teams always appreciate in value.

Kind of makes you think the players union got played during the last lockout when so many owners were crying that they were losing money. The Bucks sold for $550,000,000 with a decrepit arena, no stars in the countries 39th largest market.

Don't forget that almost ALWAYS franchise ownership brings with it lucrative real estate deals. Gretzyky made millions owning (partially) the Coyotes from the development around the new arena, all while the team stunk up the NHL and bemoaned to the league how much money they were losing.

Most owners are in the game solely for the real estate development opportunities and kickbacks. In many cases it behooves them to have the team lose money.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-30-2014, 02:41 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawgswin View Post
Don't forget that almost ALWAYS franchise ownership brings with it lucrative real estate deals. Gretzyky made millions owning (partially) the Coyotes from the development around the new arena, all while the team stunk up the NHL and bemoaned to the league how much money they were losing.

Most owners are in the game solely for the real estate development opportunities and kickbacks. In many cases it behooves them to have the team lose money.
But they dont actually lose money. It is simply untrue. Not only are they profiting wildly on the intrinsic value of the teams they make money on a day to day basis as well. Between TV money, sponsorship dollars, merchandising, and in some leagues revenue sharing and luxury tax distributions, etc they are all making money.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-30-2014, 08:15 PM
MaTH716's Avatar
MaTH716 MaTH716 is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,438
Default

I have a conspiracy theory here. The only way to get Sterling out without a lawauit is to grossly overpay him so he goes quietly. I honestly believe that the NBA told Balmer to come up with a billion/billion and a half and they'll kick in the rest under the table just to rid themselves of Sterling.

I want to believe even though he has more money than God, guys like that just don't arbitrarily throw money around like that cause they could.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-31-2014, 12:55 AM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

What are the Clippers truly worth? According to this analysis about $1.2-$1.6 billion.

http://news.yahoo.com/l-clippers-rea...7550--spt.html
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.