![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The notion that if they just "pay it forward" so to speak, that the money would then come back to them exponentially due to the fact that these employees would have * more money* is preposterous and completely unfounded. You do not need a labor-funded report to know that while yes, obviously a rise in the minimum wage would technically provide them *more money*, but the repercussion of this rise in the cost of labor is exactly what?? Food costs that much more, gas costs that much more, clothing cost that much more, etc. It is a zero sum gain at the absolute best - and in practical application, would actually drive inflation levels amok and rob them of any "perceived value" that they received. In essence, they would be even poorer. Again, the market drives these wages. In areas where there are a low volumes of theses workers, they are already getting paid 11.00-13.00 an hour. You can't and should not force employers to overpay for services without objectively quantifying what its impact to the overall economy would be. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() the change in wages and what the outcome would be is lined out in the economic policy paper i linked to. including the gains to the economy, new jobs added, etc.
|