![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
most decent 2 y.o's will/ should improve significantly in their second start - beyer wise |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Doesn't that depend on how well they ran first time?
__________________
@TimeformUSfigs |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Of course. Just like anything in horse racing, there are no steadfast rules. I've seen 2 y.o's freak their first start only to regress their second start. But "generally" speaking, if a horse is a decent 2y.o., he/she should turn in a better performance figure wise with a race under his belt, and maturation of the horse. Other factors may include trainer stats, etc.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
They paid over 300k for Medal Count. He probably has more ability than that 50 Beyer had people believe.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
so Letswastemoney, do you think that i should keep up with the horse or are you saying that 50 beyer says that he had the people that bought him fooled? I know he is by dynaformer so i dont know how precosious(sp) those are but like i said was jsut wondering.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think he's worth keeping an eye on. I don't pay much attention to speed figures earned in the first start as others have said, and with Dynaformer as the sire he might even be better on turf.
|