![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() They were good. Just seemed odd she was never tried against males in the big races. Lets not pretend like her connections were on some mission to seek out any and all competition. That is all I'm saying.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() John Shirreffs is the most conservative trainer I have met, before him Paco Gonzales. Had hole strings of nice horses in barn yet never ran them.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
that's the point. just cuz Sherrifs was too big of a mook to realize what he should have been doing. Don't blame the hoss. She did everything asked of her. Deserved to run in the big Cap and at Saratoga. Even in her lone defeat, she ran huge, and just missed to a really game hoss. Some of her races, she looked impossibly beaten , and still got up. A couple of hosses who almost beat her, ran tremendous and still lost. If you had Gio ponti, I'm sure you thought you were home free... sherrifs for not running her against tougher = bad. Zenyatta = good. Get it straight. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() mook or no mook, zens owners and trainer made their bed with her, and they can't complain now if she doesn't get what they think is due her.
you want your horse to be considered great, you run her like she's great. you don't run her like she's not, and then get offended when people say her schedule didn't allow her to prove what she 'could' be. all we know is what she actually did. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() i can't speak for everyone, not sure it's the prevailing sentiment.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Whats your sentiment?
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |