Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-30-2013, 01:30 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OTM Al View Post
How about the famous 1941 Travers Stakes. Best known for Whirlaway, the only TC winner, winning the race against two other horses that had won only a handful of races between them. Was that race disgraceful or is it just now that things are disgraceful?
I don't think any of these four will be confused with Whirlaway.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-30-2013, 01:34 PM
OTM Al's Avatar
OTM Al OTM Al is offline
Turf Paradise
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
I don't think any of these four will be confused with Whirlaway.
No, but the statement was about the race, not particular horses in it. Is it more disgraceful to have a four horse race that may be competitive or a three horse race that is a glorified workout?
__________________
facilis descensus Auerno
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-30-2013, 05:00 PM
helicopter11
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OTM Al View Post
No, but the statement was about the race, not particular horses in it. Is it more disgraceful to have a four horse race that may be competitive or a three horse race that is a glorified workout?
The fact that this race is void of any real stakes horses is bad enough.
What makes it disgraceful is that this race couldn't round up more horses even when there is no standout horses that can win this in a workout.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-30-2013, 05:47 PM
OTM Al's Avatar
OTM Al OTM Al is offline
Turf Paradise
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by helicopter11 View Post
The fact that this race is void of any real stakes horses is bad enough.
What makes it disgraceful is that this race couldn't round up more horses even when there is no standout horses that can win this in a workout.
Think it has a few stakes quality horses. Java's War was well thought of by some not so long ago if I recall. I do agree though that it is odd others aren't giving it a shot with allowance level horses. My real curiosity is where the blame is to be laid. Owners? Trainers? Racing office? A statement was made without any explanation. Didn't consider the implications of just not running it either. Matter of fact, didn't do a thing but complain, so I presented a historical example that seems even worse. But it also happened to be a historic race from the good ole days. Not every race is going to be a classic, but I don't let it bother me.
__________________
facilis descensus Auerno
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-30-2013, 07:05 PM
cakes44's Avatar
cakes44 cakes44 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,745
Default

Owners, trainers, AND the racing office are to blame. And I don't means to speak dor scavs, but I doubt he's going to lose sleep over the matter. He just knows it sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-2013, 08:01 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

There were 14 nominations. Baffert had 6 of them. He entered none.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.