|
|
 |
|
#28
06-05-2013, 09:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
another thought just hit me. the scotus just ruled a few weeks ago that you had to have a warrant for a blood draw, to check for alcohol level.
why do you have to have a warrant to draw blood, but not dna? isn't that inconsistent? seems to me it is.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln 
|
Threaded Mode