The Great Derby Paradox

[asudevil]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I'm not sure this is a paradox. The Derby is mainstream Americana. A lot of effort was made to publicize it. People are attracted to things that celebrities are doing. Handle in horse racing has been going up ( despite the cries to the contrary by the ill-informed naysayers ).

We still need to educate the public about what is fascinating about this great game if we expect to create viable new fans. I'm not saying I have the answers as to how to do this, but I would say that identifying your potential new fans correctly, or responsibly, is probably a good place to start. I do, however, think ignoring the gambling aspect of the game is not likely to allow you to turn the casual viewer into a productive participant in the game.

I should hope that the marketers behind major productions like the Triple Crown races know how to attract peoples' attentions. My question is whether or not you think the celebrity/human interest stories are being effectively counter balanced with some sort of productive fan education elements. I can't offer any specific thoughts in this instance, as I did not see any of the NBC coverage. I am actually curious.

Despite some of the usual fluff, I thought NBC continues to improve the telecast. Racing regulars must keep in mind that the network has to keep it real simple (dumbed down) for the general public. Their informational graphics, for instance, are always improving. Example...A side by side explanation of who has run in the slop and who's pedigree favored off tracks was very clean and easy. Hammond, Bailey, and Moss look very comfortable. Although some may find her annoying, Michelle Beadle's piece on race calling was great. Folks got to see the perspective from Larry's booth where they actually had him calling a live race. I do agree that a little more gambling education, incorporated into the broadcast, could be a facilitator for potential players.