![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
My posts are very consistent. A short career can't make for a great horse. As I stated, neither could be a great horse. They are both in that talented category but not great. If I had to take one or the other I would take Candy Ride. If I had to take a great horse or one of these two, I would take a great horse. Here is a logic lesson for you If somebody says a horse can't be great with a short career that does not equal that if you have two horses that were not great, the one with the longer career would be superior. I was using length of career as a factor in determining greatness, not as a factor in determining which of two non great horses is better. Do you understand that or is logic to complicated for you? You can't mix your conditions. |