![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Candy Ride should have been included in older males, and probably older turf males too.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
His lack of durability hurt him.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Really? Seriously?
Shall I go through your list and see how many I can apply that statement to? Candy Ride would have smoked almost every single horse on your list, and you know it. How durable was Bodemeister, btw? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Candy Ride had one great performance on dirt and one on turf ... part of being a great horse means coming back from big performances and repeating them. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, part of being a great horse is being able to run races that nobody else can duplicate. I'd hardly call most of those horses on your list 'great'. Maybe you meant to say something else instead of great, as the title of your thread would suggest. Top thoroughbreds. You are being silly if you really believe Candy Ride was not better than some of those you listed. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
He has no body of work though. Just an alw race, a good turf win, and a great effort on dirt in the Pac Classic. Is Bo Jackson rated better than Emmit Smith? |