Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old 11-09-2012, 09:26 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by miraja2 View Post
One suggestion I've heard before that might be interesting would be to keep the same basic system but to pass a constitutional amendment that grants the winner of the national popular vote some number of electoral votes. Maybe something like eight or ten.

That would preserve the basic foundations of the electoral college, but at the same time make it less likely that one candidate wins the popular vote but loses the electoral college. It would also give people who live in non-competitive states a bit more incentive to vote in close national elections, while at the same time preserving the merits of the state-based elections we currently have.
it's only actually happened four times in all the elections (56)that have been held. bush was the first in 112 years. and considering that the subsequent recounts show in several scenarios bush should have lost the election, then actually the electoral process was skewed because of the fla debacle.
bush didn't win altho he had less votes, he won because the recount process was stopped, and the fla electorals given to him.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.