Libya-Gate

[dellinger63]

If Obama knew it was an act of terror when he spoke in the rose garden why was Susan Rice sent out messenger pigeon style to every talk show the following Sunday, to say it was an attack by a mob, inspired by a video ?

His supporters yesterday were telling him to come clean yet if he does he admits he was wrong.

Can't wait for him to expound on the new freedoms Egyptians now enjoy under a theocracy. How accepting the country has become of other religions and how when the Muslim Bro'hood said they would not seek political office they were just joking.

Then he can explain why the murder of one of our border guards with a gun provided by us had nothing to do with him or Holder. It was simply rogue agents.

Then he can wrap up by injecting his economic plan of doubling down on green and instead of 50 bankrupt companies we need bk 100. We need more federal employees because they make 34% more on average than the private sector, thus pay more taxes even though they're paid with tax money.

Maybe if he ends each sentence with I killed Osama?

Though I suppose someone else built the helicopters to get there.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

If Obama knew it was an act of terror when he spoke in the rose garden why was Susan Rice sent out messenger pigeon style to every talk show the following Sunday, to say it was a mob inspired by a video attack?

Do you think this matters (reference to CIA intelligence)?

How Mitt Romney’s Latest Attack On Libya Is Falling Apart

By Judd Legum on Oct 20, 2012 at 12:45 pm

http://thinkprogress.org/security/20...falling-apart/

There is only one reason why the RWNJ ever screamed about "Libya". It's because Mitt Romney has zero foreign policy experience, other than insulting the British.

[dellinger63]

During the three and a half years of his presidency, for Barack, the buck has always stopped at Bush. Now, with Benghazi, that has evolved to the buck stops anywhere but Barack.

Hillary has now accepted full responsibility for the Libyan debacle, but which is a more damning reality: Obama is incompetent, or he's woefully uninformed? It seems like a wash to me.

On the anniversary of 9/11, our ambassador, lured to Benghazi for assassination, went missing while the consulate was under attack...and Barack went to bed. The next morning, with our ambassador dead, Barack flew to Vegas -- that's not even leading from behind.

Who would have ever thought that "leading from behind" would be setting the bar too high?

An Obama Department of State Regional Security Officer Eric Nordstrom said, "the Taliban is on the inside of the building." Wow, the Taliban inside the State Department -- who would have thought it? What is that, leading from inside?

But don't worry, an investigation is underway -- Hillary said so -- it should be completed sometime after November 6, just like all things Barack.

The president is right; it is the story...and for almost four years, the story Barack Obama told America has been "a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/...#ixzz2A3USLGEt

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

Do you think this matters (reference to CIA intelligence)?



There is only one reason why the RWNJ ever screamed about "Libya". It's because Mitt Romney has zero foreign policy experience, other than insulting the British.

Our current President was rolling in foreign policy experience when elected right?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

Our current President was rolling in foreign policy experience when elected right?

I posted something showing Romney's attack on the President over Libya has fallen apart with revelation of CIA information, and Clip Clop changes the subject completely.

Sure, I'll play, Clip Clop:

Obama as a candidate was an elected US Senator that had spent 4 years on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He had visited multiple countries.

Romney as a candidate has no foreign policy experience at all, no national experience, zero elected experience above state level.

And now, comparing the two candidates:

Obama now has four years of excellent, proven foreign policy experience as POTUS.

Romney still has zero - except, as a civilian, insulting our allies, putting his foot in his mouth with misspeaking, and causing the current administration grief by opening his mouth and playing politics outside our borders and with the lives of our troops overseas. Amateur, unqualified, ignorant, poor performance.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

I posted something showing Romney's attack on the President over Libya has fallen apart with revelation of CIA information, and Clip Clop changes the subject completely.

Sure, I'll play, Clip Clop:

Obama as a candidate was an elected US Senator that had spent 4 years on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He had visited multiple countries.

Romney as a candidate has no foreign policy experience at all, no national experience, zero elected experience above state level.

And now, comparing the two candidates:

Obama now has four years of excellent, proven foreign policy experience as POTUS.

Romney still has zero - except, as a civilian, insulting our allies, putting his foot in his mouth with misspeaking, and causing the current administration grief by opening his mouth and playing politics outside our borders and with the lives of our troops overseas. Amateur, unqualified, ignorant, poor performance.

Pointless to play, you are a true believer. 4 whole years! Wow, he really was qualified as referenced by the unequivocal success he has been as President. Everyone knows where you stand.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

Pointless to play, you are a true believer. 4 whole years! Wow, he really was qualified as referenced by the unequivocal success he has been as President. Everyone knows where you stand.

What a moronic thing you say. You asked what FP experience Obama had as a candidate, I listed it. Fact. I also listed Romney's. Fact.

I didn't maintain Obama's FP experience before election was exceptional, or even qualifying in my opinion. I stated no opinion regarding Obama as a candidate. I simply listed it.

Geeshus, and you take that and make it a personal insult to me about "true believer" and your assumptions about what I think?? What the hell is wrong with you? You just assume crap about everybody, on a simplistic and black and white level?

And for you to want to talk FP experience of candidates, and yet you completely ignore the fact Romney has literally zero, is hypocritical to the extreme.

^^^ This is why this country can't have nice things.

[OldDog]

"Yeah, it was about the video. Read the newspaper. Thank you. Everybody knows it's about the video. It's all about the video."

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-she...-video-read-ne

Well, there you go.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

What a moronic thing you say. You asked what FP experience Obama had as a candidate, I listed it. Fact. I also listed Romney's. Fact. I didn't ask, I just referenced that he had none. you are saying a lack of experience is a reason not to vote Romney, yet you voted Obama who you yourself say didnt have enough to be qualified.

I didn't maintain Obama's FP experience before election was exceptional, or even qualifying in my opinion. I stated no opinion regarding Obama as a candidate. I simply listed it.

Geeshus, and you take that and make it a personal insult to me about "true believer" and your assumptions about what I think?? You share what you think pretty regularly here and it proves your true believer status. What the hell is wrong with you? Lots of things. You just assume crap about everybody, on a simplistic and black and white level? Nope, I work off of what I read from the writers.

And for you to want to talk FP experience of candidates, and yet you completely ignore the fact Romney has literally zero, is hypocritical to the extreme.
Not ignoring anything, neither of these men are qualified to lead this countries and both are wholly owned pawns.
^^^ This is why this country can't have nice things.

See above