Was there really a rail bias?

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by repent

calm down weirdo.

I did not say there was a rail bias at Arlington.
said they changed the running surface.
was favoring speed all day on the dirt track at Arlington.
all winners were close or on the lead.

did not even mention the terms "rail" and "Arlington" in the same sentence.

the relevance of what I type is up to each individual poster.
please feel free to ignore my words in the future you freak.


Repent

"distinct rail bias on BC day.
same thing that happened at Arlington in 2002."

one sentence follows the other, and says "same thing" -- the english language and syntactical structures dictate that that sentence has to reference the one before it, with very few exceptions -- especially not something that you said much much much earlier.

good to see that nothing has changed though in the last few years you "freak" -- that you're still convinced that only your logic works and as long as you can convince yourself of something, that it has to be true. that is why you're an idiot.

ps that sentence that said "that is why you're an idiot" references a post that i made yesterday to someone else, lest you get confused because it is clearly placed as if it references you. see, that's how the language works my friend.