Was there really a rail bias?

[repent]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

rail bias on Arlington BC day? Are you kidding me? With 3 and 4-wide horses winning, and azeri going wire to wire?

i'm not sure what you're looking at. does a 4-wide move around the turn and into the stretch constitute the "rail?" If so then there's a rail bias everywhere, and that is called geometry. horses running 9-wide do not regularly win anything, let alone their biggest race of the year.

you've basically just shown that your judgment of a rail bias is terrible, so your thoughts on CD Saturday are basically irrelevant.

calm down weirdo.

I did not say there was a rail bias at Arlington.
said they changed the running surface.
was favoring speed all day on the dirt track at Arlington.
all winners were close or on the lead.

did not even mention the terms "rail" and "Arlington" in the same sentence.

the relevance of what I type is up to each individual poster.
please feel free to ignore my words in the future you freak.


Repent