Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
You are right about one thing. I should have kept my mouth shut, because of small minded, Kool-Aid drinking fools who believe every word uttered or printed by mass media.
You say the above, then follow up with this below...
So, let me get this straight. I'm the one starting crap with you for no reason, yet you start a thread devoted to how Swale allegedly died? Uh, yeah, you really weren't making a comment whatsoever! You are so full of shid, and the sad thing is, you don't even know it.
As for my insecurities, you are the one who started this, not me. Go look in the mirror. With the grace of God, hopefully you don't like what you see.
So, you now admit you did start a thread all for me! Which is it? Were you making a comment, or not, about what I said?
Talk about insecurities! I was in no way trying to expose anyone's ignorance, or laying bare any foundations, or whatever awful metaphors you want to throw at me. It is telling, however, how you reacted.
What I did do? I made a very clear statement in my one response to Merlinsky, but you, you have no idea how to read subtlety at all. In one brief sentence, I said more than you ever have with all of your mindless drivel, quoting the same old sources that say nothing at all.
I've come to realize you are nothing more than a shrill shill like creature.
My apologies to creatures everywhere.
|
Ohfercripessakes, get a grip on reality, Shirley. You are too paranoid. You are not that important
You went off about the "secret" way Swale died. You were crapping up Paynter's thread.
I started a separate thread about Swale, and just posted the original article, the original on the autopsy, the interesting fact the groom wrote a book (which I didn't know about, I might buy it), and the "current knowledge" on what may or may not have killed Swale.
You are free to post your theory. Go for it!
Who knows? I might even believe your secret mysterious theory. I've not said one way or the other.