Your tax calculator under Presidential candidate plans

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

Here you go: Mitt's entire budget plan -

but, no, LOL - I cannot magically include "parts not public yet" (what the hell do you mean by that, it doesn't make any sense!?)

http://www.mittromney.com/blogs/mitt...middle-class01

Go to the bottom, and click where it says Click here to download a printable copy. to get the detail

Clip-Clop: Romney has released a Budget Plan. It is what it is. It:
1. Raises taxes on middle class and poor
2. Massive tax cut for wealthy
3. Increases our debt by trillions over the years.

You are free to show how it doesn't do that.

It's very close to the Paul Ryan Budget Plan, which does the same thing (but Mittens has more tax cuts for the wealthy)

I have read the plan, I am certain you have not. Since you never seem to read anything other than opinion pieces. I am looking for the specific numbers without any assumptions that prove what you and the magic calculator have asserted.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

I have read the plan, I am certain you have not.

Then post you copy of Romneys Budget Plan here. Thanks!

I'm not a financial analyst, so I leave that to the professionals, and listen to their opinions.

As you say you have read Romney's Budget plan in detail, please show where the public financial analysts, who put their analysis out there for peer review, are wrong about Romney's plan:

1) increasing taxes for the middle and lower class
2) giving massive tax breaks to the wealthy
3) decreases our income and causes our deficit to rise by trillions over the years.

Because Clip Clop, you are the only person I've seen take this stand. So please, show us where all the other public financial analysts are wrong. What are they wrong about? Does it not raise middle class taxes? Does it not increase the deficit? What part is wrong?

[Clip-Clop]

OK

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

OK

Yes, you should stick with "Washington all sucks" and vote accordingly. Because the people in Washington, that you say suck, don't get there on their own. They are put there by voters, just like you. If "Washington and all elected officials suck", it's your own fault.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

Yes, you should stick with "Washington all sucks" and vote accordingly. Because the people in Washington, that you say suck, don't get there on their own. They are put there by voters, just like you. If "Washington and all elected officials suck", it's your own fault.

Voter fraud nullified my votes. They are put there not by voters like me. More than a few of the worst in recent memory have been put there by voters like yourself. Only they live in NY and Nevada and California mostly.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

Voter fraud nullified my votes.

No, you were in a minority those elections, and your candidates didn't win.

The point is, that you complain about Washington, as if it's some independent entity, and what our government is, is nobody's fault but ours, the voters.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

No, you were in a minority those elections, and your candidates didn't win.

The point is, that you complain about Washington, as if it's some independent entity, and what our government is, is nobody's fault but ours, the voters.

If a and b both suck, and c cannot win what are you left with? Don't be silly.