Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old 07-19-2012, 06:32 AM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default

Uhh - the required showing of official ID is not disenfranchisement.

It does however prevent those who would otherwise vote more than once in a particular election from doing so. So if a previously fraudulent voter could not vote the 4 times he intended to, and instead was limited to 1 vote like the rest of us, I guess you could say he has a disenfranchisement factor of 75%. Is that what you are referring to?

Would the Secret Service allow this same voter to be at a campaign rally for the president or vice president without ID, or allow the individual to remain after being asked for, and not producing the ID?

The fact that the Democratic Party has once again decided to take the position for lawlessness, as they have with the non-enforcement of border security, and in favor of "sanctuary cities" and the like, is proof that they are stupid, devious, or both.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.