![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
How's that high horse, Lady Disdain?
![]()
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
You're talking about state exchanges versus the Medicaid expansion. One can set up one without tackling the other. They're not mutually exclusive. Jindal's statement above is that he's not going to set up an exchange, which was well within his rights as a state governor before the Supreme Court ever acted on the law.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I hope they all change their minds. They are going to be in trouble with the exchanges, however, as those take time to set up, and these govs are delaying that. If the govs don't set up the exchanges, the Feds will just give the state a federally-run exchange. But if the Gov. declines the Medicaid expansion, the citizens of the state will continue paying for the uninsured "freeloaders" as they are now. And those poor people will remain without health care.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |