![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
i found it interesting in the ruling the other day where roberts essentially pulled the rug out from under ppuca, by saying current funding for current medicaid would not be allowed to be cut if a state opted out of obamacare.
in other words, he's now said nullification is allowed. john c calhoun would have a party if he knew.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
They're gonna have a good time with re-election, after they tell their citizens, they are personally refusing federally-funded health care for them (the Medicaid expansion) that won't cost the state or the recipient a dime ![]() The govs can also refuse to set up state exchanges, but that just mean the feds come in and do it for them. That means they lose their state-control, and state-specific type of exchange. Ceding federal control is a pretty funny choice for these "state's rights" ultra-conservative, tea-partier types to take.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |