|  |  | 
|  | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 Since you brought it up, I didn't understand the hype that this was some type of showdown between Bernardini and Lava Man. What about the rest of the field and in particular Invasor? I really don't know why Invasor wasn't, and still isn't a hyped horse. He is tough and consistently awesome. | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   everyone i work with knows i'm a fan....i didn't have one question about it today at work. like i said the other day, isn't that why we come here?? talking about horses to virtual strangers, cause no one else knows or cares about it.... bernardini winning or losing saturday didn't mean anything long term for this sport. it doesn't matter one bit who wins each race. the only affect bernardini will have long term on horse racing is whether he's a success at stud or not. 
				__________________ Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 http://www.bloodhorse.com/pdf/bc_man...oster_2006.pdf Also, I do think that seeing Bernardini win impressively would have been better than seeing him run 2nd. I think he ran a great second, but to some - esecially non sports fans - 2nd, no matter how good/bad it is, is just a losing effort. I do think that the fans that he could have attracted woudl have been s you said people not to be counted on, but you never know. I'd rather have the fans for a couple of months than not at all. Its not provable that he'd have indeed brought in more fans but that's just how I feel. Tons of individual horses have brought fans to the game - Funny Cide brought a ton in I think (he got me hooked), Smarty Jones, Point Given was the one who first got me interested. If I had to venture a guess, I'd say that most people on here could pinpoint one of the 'greats' that brought them in - Slew, Affirmed, Secretariat, etc. Not all, but quite a few. I'm not comparing Bernardini to those, because he isnt, but wouldnt it have been great if he was? THen again, wouldnt it have been great if he had no nuts? LOL 
				__________________ Reppin the Duquesne University class of 2009 . (Then its time to get a real job  ) I cant believe what a bunch of nerds we are. We're looking up money laundering in the dictionary. www.myspace.com/dustinfabian Last edited by 1st_Saturday_in_May : 11-06-2006 at 09:16 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 Yes a great horse might attract casual people and some of them may hang around and become long term fans. I just think in the long run it doesn't convert many. My main point was that I think that there was one great horse that was overlooked by everyone including the marketers. To bring in the most viewers they should have billed it as a battle of the worlds best, US (East and West), South America (Invasor), Europe (George and Junior). | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Glad that's over. | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Jim, that would have been a great idea!  You shoulda sold it to the Breeders Cup!  People eat up that nationality stuff.  'Tiznow wins it for America' You need to get into their marketing dept. because I think they did a poor job of marketing this year.  Relied too much on Bernardini and that bit them in the ass.  I'll be there to chance things for the 09 Breeders Cup with my sports marketing degree   
				__________________ Reppin the Duquesne University class of 2009 . (Then its time to get a real job  ) I cant believe what a bunch of nerds we are. We're looking up money laundering in the dictionary. www.myspace.com/dustinfabian | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 Beat to the punch by first sat... just read it after I posted. | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 |