Obama's World

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

Obama-Biden 2012, baby. Plus sweep of the Senate and House by Independents and Dems. Pull this country kicking and screaming, out of the hands of the anti-everything loons, and into the 21st century with the other big countries

Which point was missed?
I asked which countries we should be compared to based on this statement. You chose not to answer. I suggested it was unfair to the USA to compare this country with then un-named countries you referred to. You said first world (an antique of a term if ever there was one). I asked about population and the issues facing each nation and how any comparison could be made fairly and you replied that we are not first in anything. I ask you to show me a country that spends more, to prove YOUR point,on its poor and I get your last post as a response.
My point is proven, you are impossible to debate with, as others have pointed out many times.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

Which point was missed?
I asked which countries we should be compared to based on this statement. You chose not to answer. I suggested it was unfair to the USA to compare this country with then un-named countries you referred to. You said first world (an antique of a term if ever there was one). I asked about population and the issues facing each nation and how any comparison could be made fairly and you replied that we are not first in anything. I ask you to show me a country that spends more, to prove YOUR point,on its poor and I get your last post as a response.
My point is proven, you are impossible to debate with, as others have pointed out many times.

Riots form of debating

when Riot disagrees "do you have a link for that"

when it's Riot's own opinion post "do you have a link for that"

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

Riots form of debating

when Riot disagrees "do you have a link for that"

when it's Riot's own opinion post "do you have a link for that"

"Debating" usually involves going after a subject tenaciously, not another poster.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

Riots form of debating

when Riot disagrees "do you have a link for that"

when it's Riot's own opinion post "do you have a link for that"

So...I am not crazy then. That is a relief.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

So...I am not crazy then. That is a relief.

It is pointless to try but we all do it. It is usually (add some liberal comment from a blog, huffington, etc) then deflect the original question, post some liberal link, deflect again. Obama is great, GOP is the devil, more government, obamacare is the greatest thing ever, Down with the GOP. I used to be a republican, deflect again. You are stupid. I am the smartest person ever and I know more than you. Repeat.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

It is pointless to try but we all do it. It is usually (add some liberal comment from a blog, huffington, etc) then deflect the original question, post some liberal link, deflect again. Obama is great, GOP is the devil, more government, obamacare is the greatest thing ever, Down with the GOP. I used to be a republican, deflect again. You are stupid. I am the smartest person ever and I know more than you. Repeat.

Wow. The opinions in your angry mind are interesting. I don't agree, but hey - it's hard to fight prejudices people won't drop.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

Wow. The opinions in your angry mind are interesting.

Just the facts. No anger or hatred on my end. I can admit when I am wrong. In this I am not wrong. Why don't you look at your posts? You hardly ever answer a question and 90% of your links are from liberal blogs, newspapers, etc. When people ask you for a simple yes/no answer you can't do it. You have NEVER admitted when you were wrong.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

Which point was missed?
I asked which countries we should be compared to based on this statement. You chose not to answer. I suggested it was unfair to the USA to compare this country with then un-named countries you referred to. You said first world (an antique of a term if ever there was one). I asked about population and the issues facing each nation and how any comparison could be made fairly and you replied that we are not first in anything. I ask you to show me a country that spends more, to prove YOUR point,on its poor and I get your last post as a response.
My point is proven, you are impossible to debate with, as others have pointed out many times.

My point was about the difference between the GOP and the Dems political platforms.

If you don't think America should be in the 21st century like the other big countries, you might try stating why you don't agree, and you might provide some support for your differing opinion.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

My point was about the difference between the GOP and the Dems political platforms.

If you don't think America should be in the 21st century like the other big countries, you might try stating why you don't agree, and you might provide some support for your differing opinion.

The small countries cannot afford it. Neither can we.
Cooking the books is not an option.
Taxing the corporations into the Earth is not a viable option (especially the way things are in the world). They do not PAY taxes, they collect them, guess from whom they collect them?