Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-26-2012, 11:51 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jms62 View Post
You do realize I was being sarcastic, right.
ok.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-26-2012, 12:05 PM
lord007 lord007 is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
tax brackets remain in place thru this year, but if no adjustments are made, all brackets revert to what they were in 2000. which means a big increase. oh, and look what 2013 isn't-an election year.

then there's the alternative minimum tax:


More AMT victims, higher taxes
On today's tax returns, when an AMT payment is required, affected taxpayers could end up paying thousands more in taxes. Absent any law change, by 2015, some estimates predict that nearly 50 million filers could end up paying this parallel levy.

Why the increase? Because the tax is not indexed for inflation. Without that annual adjustment, your yearly raises of a few percentage points have been moving you closer or even into the income realm that the tax law deemed almost 40 years ago as prime AMT bait.

You could owe AMT if your taxable income in 2010 was more than:
•$72,450 for a married couple filing a joint return and surviving spouses.
•$47,450 for singles and heads of household.
•$36,225 for a married person filing separately.
Congress regularly bumps up the earnings amounts to keep more middle-income filers from paying more under the system. While that law change helps out millions of taxpayers who might otherwise pay the AMT, the uncertainty of when and how much relief will be provided is a constant area of frustration for taxpayers who have encountered or might face the alternative minimum tax.
http://news.investors.com/Article/59...back-taxes.htm...speaking of taxes
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-26-2012, 12:24 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lord007 View Post
wow.

but really, is that a correct report?? i could have sworn obama said he'd have the most ethical...

oh, what's the use? i said he was lying then, and apparently he was. four more years!! four more years!
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-26-2012, 12:27 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/us...l-hurdles.html


now dems are serious?


maybe super serial?
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-26-2012, 12:31 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

129036995977101796.jpg
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:38 PM
Clip-Clop Clip-Clop is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manningtown, Colorado
Posts: 2,727
Default

How about a simple "fair share" checkbox on the forms? This way all those wealthy members of Congress could set an example this year about how serious they are.
__________________
don't run out of ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-26-2012, 02:28 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
wow.

but really, is that a correct report?? i could have sworn obama said he'd have the most ethical...

oh, what's the use? i said he was lying then, and apparently he was. four more years!! four more years!
It's also Obama's fault that elected officials and lifetime government workers in Chicago owe back taxes

Quote:
The tax offenders include employees of the U.S. Senate who help write the laws imposed on everyone else. They owe $2.1 million. Workers in the House of Representatives owe $8.5 million, Department of Education employees owe $4.3 million and over at Homeland Security, 4,697 workers owe about $37 million. Active duty military members owe more than $100 million.
Yes, Obama is clearly responsible for this. It's all his fault. And he clearly supports people owing back taxes.

Good god, the ridiculousness of Obama Derangement is palpable.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts

Last edited by Riot : 01-26-2012 at 02:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.