It's Obama's fault...

[geeker2]

Originally Posted by Riot

BTW - it is the Republican Governor of Nebraska that is leading the charge for delaying the pipeline until environmental threats can be mitigated.

Sigh I guess not


Nebraska's Republican Gov. Dave Heineman, whose state is a key part of the Keystone XL oil pipeline debate, expressed his disappointment with the final decision the Obama administration made yesterday to kill the project.
"I want to say I'm very disappointed," Heineman told POLITICO. "I think the president made a mistake."



http://www.politico.com/politico44/2...ke-111473.html

[Riot]

Originally Posted by geeker2

Sigh I guess not


Nebraska's Republican Gov. Dave Heineman, whose state is a key part of the Keystone XL oil pipeline debate, expressed his disappointment with the final decision the Obama administration made yesterday to kill the project.
"I want to say I'm very disappointed," Heineman told POLITICO. "I think the president made a mistake."



http://www.politico.com/politico44/2...ke-111473.html

Sigh. I guess so. If you read two sentence beyond what you quote, it says, "The White House has used Heineman as political cover in the fight, pointing to the fact that the original route approved by the State Department was opposed by Heineman for ecological reasons."

There is plenty more out there, over the past year, about Heineman's opposition. His opposition is why there was supposed to be an alternative plan avoiding the aquafier, which TransCanada did not yet submit, thus why State and Obama have so far not approved Keystone XL.

Opinion
Six reasons Keystone XL was a bad deal all along

By Sally Kohn

Published January 18, 2012

| FoxNews.com

1. Keystone XL Would Not Reduce Foreign Oil Dependency

The oil to be sent through Keystone XL pipeline was never destined for US markets. In its own presentation to investors about the proposed pipeline extension, TransCanada (the company behind Keystone XL) boasted that most if not all of the extracted and refined oil would be exported --- sold in oversees markets where oil fetches a higher price (and thus turns a higher profit for the company).

2. Keystone XL Would Have Increased Domestic Oil Prices

Currently, Canadian oil reserves stored in the Midwest help suppress gas prices in the United States, particularly for farmers in our nation’s heartland.

In its permit application for the pipeline, TransCanada noted that the Keystone XL pipeline would allow the company to drain these reserves and export that fuel as well. According to TransCanada’s own statements, this would raise gas prices in the United States, especially in the Midwest.

3. Keystone XL Overstated Number of Jobs to be Created

In 2008, TransCanada’s original permit application to the State Department said the Keystone XL pipeline would create “a peak workforce of approximately 3,500 to 4,200 construction personnel” in temporary jobs building the pipeline.

By 2011, now facing growing opposition to the pipeline, TransCanada had inflated these numbers (using undisclosed formulas) to 20,000. Supporters of the proposal, backed by big oil, have since trumpeted these trumped up numbers.

4. Current Keystone Pipeline Leaked 12 Times in Last Year

The pipeline that the Obama administration has rejected the permit for would be an extension of a pipeline that has already leaked -- not just once, but 12 times in the last year.

While TransCanada tried to dismiss these leaks as “minor” averaging “just five to 10 gallons of oil” each, the leak on May 7, 2011 near Millner, N.D., spilled about 21,000 gallons of oil in total.

5. The Environmental Concerns About Oil Leaks Are Justified

Nebraska’s Republican Governor Dave Heineman strongly opposed the Keystone XL project because the pipeline would run through a massive and vital aquifer in his state the supplies clean drinking water to over 2 million Americans plus water that fuels the region’s agriculture industry.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/...#ixzz1jxhO1rxv

[geeker2]

so I guess the "cover" is now gone...


"I fully expect we could get it done certainly in the early September, August time frame," the governor told Fox News on Thursday. "I would send the letter back to the president of the United States saying we approve it and if he were decisive, he could turn around and approve it shortly thereafter, well before the November election."

Read all of the propaganda, geeker. Love Obama.

[geeker2]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Read all of the propaganda, geeker. Love Obama.

SIGH.... how can you help but

[Danzig]

Barack Obama vows to do 'whatever it takes' to grow economy
AFP Jan 7, 2012, 05.08PM IST
Tags:white house|united states|Labor department
WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama promised on Saturday to do "whatever it takes" to maintain growth in the US economy as he announced a summit with business leaders dedicated to job creation at home.

"This year, I'm going to keep doing whatever it takes to move this economy forward and to make sure that middle class families regain the security they've lost over the past decade," Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address.


...there must be fine print somewhere that add the caveat 'as long as it doesn't irritate some potential voters'. i know somewhere along the line he said he would do what was necessary, even if it meant only one term. just like all other politicians, when his lips move he's lying.

[Danzig]

http://news.yahoo.com/congress-legal...013431403.html


interesting...wonder how this is going to shake out.