|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
01-19-2012, 04:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
 That doesn't even make "opposite" satirical sense 
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts 
|
|
#2
01-19-2012, 04:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
01-19-2012, 04:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 But I do get what you were trying to say 
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
|
|
#4
01-19-2012, 10:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
And the debate winner is ... who do you think?
Gingrich - threw red meat after hunk of read meat to the angry white older voter. They love them some angry hater.
Santorum - got the conservative pro-life vote. Sounded the most serious and educated on stage. Did very well. Romney - did the worse. Rambled, bumbled. The guy cannot talk without a teleprompter. Paul - they ignored him as usual, but there's more time now. So when he talks, he ends up rambling off into crazy land.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
|
Hybrid Mode
