Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > Joe Silverio Simulcast Center
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2012, 11:11 PM
ADJMK ADJMK is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,322
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogey View Post
Good deal, I'm trying to figure out how the Double ending in race 8 @ GP paid $1270.60 (23-1 over 33-1) and the PK3 Paid $246.60 (9-2, 23-1, 33-1)
Pick 3: 7th-8th-9th to Miss Netta at 4/5 paid $3,178.
Hard to believe someone bet a $110 ticket to a $69 first time starter. Must be a Catalano fan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-06-2012, 10:07 AM
analyizethis analyizethis is offline
Sunshine Park
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Naperville, Illinois, Arlington Park
Posts: 92
Default

4/all/1,6 is 18 combinations as there were 9 betting interests in the middle leg, so (ignoring the fact that the math doesn't come out even (maybe some impact of a currency exchange difference)) if the $110 ticket was weighted equally the bettor would have played the combo six times and had 6 winning $1 tickets. That means they would have collected $1,479.60 for $110 or 12.5 to 1 payoff. Not so great considering it took a $49.60 winner in the all leg to get to that point. I guess they also would have collected 6 times on the consolation pick 3 for another $36 increasing the payoff to 12.78 - 1.

If they really liked the Catalano horse they could have created a parlay with the 4 in the first leg and the other two in the last. $110 to win on the 4 would have returned $605 and then with equal weighting $300 (with $5 for a Molson) to win on the long shot winner returns $10,410 (there would have been some impact on the win pool and payoff but I am going to assume it would not have been much) and a payoff of 93.63-1.

Since the exacta in the last leg was 1 - 6 I am going to presume that they also had that at $502.2 for $2.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-06-2012, 11:25 AM
Port Conway Lane Port Conway Lane is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by analyizethis View Post
4/all/1,6 is 18 combinations as there were 9 betting interests in the middle leg, so (ignoring the fact that the math doesn't come out even (maybe some impact of a currency exchange difference)) if the $110 ticket was weighted equally the bettor would have played the combo six times and had 6 winning $1 tickets. That means they would have collected $1,479.60 for $110 or 12.5 to 1 payoff. Not so great considering it took a $49.60 winner in the all leg to get to that point. I guess they also would have collected 6 times on the consolation pick 3 for another $36 increasing the payoff to 12.78 - 1.

If they really liked the Catalano horse they could have created a parlay with the 4 in the first leg and the other two in the last. $110 to win on the 4 would have returned $605 and then with equal weighting $300 (with $5 for a Molson) to win on the long shot winner returns $10,410 (there would have been some impact on the win pool and payoff but I am going to assume it would not have been much) and a payoff of 93.63-1.

Since the exacta in the last leg was 1 - 6 I am going to presume that they also had that at $502.2 for $2.
I believe it was implied the guy had the $1 pick 3 110 times. Had he not wagered, two $1 tickets would have split 27k+.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-06-2012, 11:52 AM
analyizethis analyizethis is offline
Sunshine Park
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Naperville, Illinois, Arlington Park
Posts: 92
Default

Ok I get it.

So if the ticket was 1/9/2 = 18 *110, it cost $1,980 for which he got (110 * 246.6) =$27,126 for a 12.7 - 1 payoff.

I would still contend that if they liked the single in the first leg and the other 2 (one of which was 33.7 - 1) in the third leg that much there was a better way to invest $2,000 then going all in the middle.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-06-2012, 12:20 PM
Port Conway Lane Port Conway Lane is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by analyizethis View Post
Ok I get it.

So if the ticket was 1/9/2 = 18 *110, it cost $1,980 for which he got (110 * 246.6) =$27,126 for a 12.7 - 1 payoff.

I would still contend that if they liked the single in the first leg and the other 2 (one of which was 33.7 - 1) in the third leg that much there was a better way to invest $2,000 then going all in the middle.
I suppose...Now that the results can be reviewed it makes it easy to play what if. He could have reaped half of what he got back with a $2 play. Obviously he hurt his price the way it played out.
I wouldn't be surprised if the same guy had 3/4 or even swept the p-5. Four
$.50 tickets were cashed while there was only one ticket on the p-4.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-06-2012, 12:34 PM
analyizethis analyizethis is offline
Sunshine Park
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Naperville, Illinois, Arlington Park
Posts: 92
Default

Good point on the pick 5. The pick 5 paid 25% of the parlay price which is the lowest since the introduction of the pick 5 at Gulfstream last year.

The point on the pick 3 is that the result was a "best case scenario" as the next to longest shot on the board won the middle (all) leg and the lesson for all of us to learn for the future is that the player turned it into a 13 -1 shot based on his bet.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.