Penn State

[horseofcourse]

Originally Posted by Cardus

We are trained to worship elites? Is this taught at Penn State? I wasn't taught this. It sounds like Nazism.

Your post reads like an "relativist" defense, but we are talking about this instance.

Announcing that anyone has a "right" to express dismay is not the point; whether it is a moral defense is the point.

What the protesting students are doing, whether they know it or not -- and shame on them if they do not understand this notion -- is defending a man who protected a pedophile. There is no way around that.

It is unfathomable to me that any human being would put their idolatry before the lives of innocent children. And those who do are wrong.

We are not talking about a coach who violated NCAA rules, or blew a .11, or had a drug problem. I could see a mass protest if that were the case.

Is pedophilia in a "gray area"?

Those who treat it as such -- and I expect 18-21 year-olds to get this -- are immoral.

Good post. I do not worhsip elites...an extremely large percentage of Americans do. A lot of people actually respected and still do, Ronald Reagan, another senile criminal bastard of similar strain as Joe Paterno. I view the misguided students worshipping Paterno as those who actually think Reagan was someone to be admired. He isn't, nor is paterno at this point. I was hopeful Paterno was just a doddering old fool hanging on for meaningless records. I was sadly wrong. I think the students currently at Penn State doing their stuff on Wednesday night holding joe vigils were simply misguided which I understand. I feel the same about people who still think Ronald REagan was a good man. He wasn't. Many people will disagree with me on that which is fine, but that is why I defended the misguided students at Penn State. Simply misguided at this time.

[clyde]

Originally Posted by Cardus

Another "relativist" defense: Joe Paterno is bad, but so is Ronald Reagan.

I understand that you are contextualizing this -- while revealing your political leanings quite clearly -- but is it necessary?

The above nitwiticizm comes to you from the Cowardly Lion.


CardMe...go brownie up one of the idols over at NA...you don't work here.

[clyde]

Come and shoot me.









Oh...and explain why I am a loser.

[clyde]

Originally Posted by Cardus

I use a word for people like you: faux.

Fuc_ing loser.

Not exactly a deep thinker, are ya.




Did you know they talk behind your back at NA?

There's a secret members room there and they think you are yuk 'em up.

[clyde]

Originally Posted by Cardus

CardMe?

Lame.

Fuc_ing loser.

I agree...it is a lame name.

[clyde]

Come on CardUs....we don't have all night here.

[clyde]

Originally Posted by Cardus

Apparently, you do.

This is your entire life: being a fuc_ing loser in Internet Land.

And you are ...where?...right now...doing what?

[clyde]

Uhm... I didn't get your answer there, CardThem.



Are you going to evade the question like you evade winning horsey's?

[clyde]

Isn't it true, CardEveryone ..that you are a member of multiple horsey boards?




And isn't it also true you are a member of the American Nazi Party?

[clyde]

Originally Posted by Cardus

With each post, you get lamer.

CardThem?

What is that stupid sh_t you post?

"Laughing and rolling on ze floor". You know, like you're German?

CardThem.

Funny sh_t, Morty!

Oh boy.


It's "rule-eng un ze flour"...which is obviously French.







God you're stupid!!