obamas job proposal

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

The first $800 plus billion package failed.

No, it did not fail. I recently posted multiple financial analytic sources that say yes, it created plenty of jobs.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

No, it did not fail. I recently posted multiple financial analytic sources that say yes, it created plenty of jobs.

Give potential employers an incentive say $2K for every new hire, payable after 2 years employment. That $300 billion would represent a minimum of 15 million jobs if collected. (Or 40 million jobs for $800 billion which shows just how much the first stimulus failed.) It would also reward successful companies in that they would be the ones needing and hiring new employees. As an additional bonus, the incentive would be due in two years. No immediate outlay of any cash, thus no new financial burden for the American taxpayer today and for years to come.

With the added personal income and payroll taxes over two years employment more than covering the $300 billion or any portion collected, it's sure-fire.

But that will never happen with this guy because jobs are far down on the list of priorities as demonstrated by this newest giveaway.

[lord007]

Originally Posted by Riot

No, it did not fail. I recently posted multiple financial analytic sources that say yes, it created plenty of jobs.

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnal...?id=583866&p=1

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by lord007

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnal...?id=583866&p=1

Brilliant right wing rag..

[jms62]

Originally Posted by lord007

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnal...?id=583866&p=1

Wow you found a fuking editorial that agrees with your position. I am truly impressed.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by jms62

Wow you found a fuking editorial that agrees with your position. I am truly impressed.

It's pretty basic stuff, historical numbers and such. Since you want to generalize things and lump every company in the US with Enron or any other distasteful occurence I would think you would enjoy the simplicity.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

It's pretty basic stuff, historical numbers and such. Since you want to generalize things and lump every company in the US with Enron or any other distasteful occurence I would think you would enjoy the simplicity.

I don't bother to read them as I know the net is they support the posters position. If you are reading them you are spending too much time. Time that may better be spent training your horses... Just sayin

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by jms62

I don't bother to read them as I know the net is they support the posters position. If you are reading them you are spending too much time. Time that may better be spent training your horses... Just sayin

Wow you are smart. That is some talent, being able to critique articles that you didn't even bother reading. Maybe you should be reading the help wanted ads...

Here this should help

http://corp.7-eleven.com/Careers/tabid/136/Default.aspx

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Wow you are smart. That is some talent, being able to critique articles that you didn't even bother reading. Maybe you should be reading the help wanted ads...

Here this should help

http://corp.7-eleven.com/Careers/tabid/136/Default.aspx

Dude. I have a job and always have had a job but since you are getting personal maybe you should look at the ad. And as far as your economics http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLweQe3ZprE

[dino]

The Big O's job proposal is very simple. Half the people get up and go to work everyday and the other half's job is to stay home and let us support them.
Then the half that doesn't work, or pay taxes, votes for him. Very simple.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

No, it did not fail. I recently posted multiple financial analytic sources that say yes, it created plenty of jobs.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...p_mostpop_read

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...p_mostpop_read