![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Tar sands pipeline - Should US allow Canada to build it? Pick 2 | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 75.00% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 30.00% |
Climate change is a concern |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 10.00% |
I don't care about environmental issues |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 10.00% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() a new article this morning on the subject, with protesters having been arrested:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44386975...-oil-pipeline/ TransCanada, a leading North American pipeline operator, started operation of Keystone I, a 36-inch pipeline system, in June 2010, making it possible to deliver Canadian oil to markets across Midwest farmland in several states, from the Dakotas through Illinois. Keystone XL will incorporate a section of that existing pipeline in its delivery through the bottom half of the US. ...i didn't know they already had a pipeline in the country, that this oil was already being moved thru part of the u.s. Environment Minister Peter Kent told Reuters that his government “can look forward to eventual approval by the American government” and that TransCanada had “perhaps one of the best records of any pipeline operator” in North America. Proponents of the pipeline say it will help the troubled US economy. TransCanada says the US will receive $20 billion through new job creation and local property taxes. The State Department report estimates that the pipeline will create between 5,000 and 6,000 new jobs that will generate up to $419 million in total wages. Nearly $7 billion will be added through additional costs, such as supplies and permitting.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |