![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
As for Baffert's works, he gets bullets but some get them the right way and some get them the wrong way. Coil is real real good right now, and I am excited to have a decent group all together on Sat. (track bias and all)
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Almost forgot, Scavs can you please share the bias for Sat so I can tell Jesus? I actually have not been focusing in on Saratago so I'm being kinda serious. Thanks
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think the word bias is used very loosely. Was there a bias on Belmont day? What's the evidence for that, Trappe Shot and It's Tricky? It's not like they both haven't come back to run very well. Justin Phillip? He's a mud freak that dominated a bad race.
I don't believe there was any true bias on Preakness day. As far as Derby day, the outside paths certainly seemed better but that's what a million people used as evidence to bet Master of Hounds in his next start and that didn't work out so well. Saratoga has been much kinder (than normal) to speed this meet in my opinion. It has had a lot more to do with the rain and drying out tracks IMO. Last year's Travers Day bias came out of nowhere and I hope it doesn't happen again. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
does 'deep' count.. ive personally seen the track at saratoga set up for outside horses..but hey the track supers do an oustanding job most all of the time.'bieng serious'
|