![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Couldn't possibly be Unmitigated Greed?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() So they ALL, uniformly, showed "Unmitigated Greed"?
Or is it more likely, due to the uniformity of their action, that the conditions for making profit here in the United States was comprimised by unions and high labor rates, high taxes, excessive regulation, and the like? Greed would be the pursuit of excessive profit, right? But stable and substantial profits at some level must be made if a company is to stay in business. They moved the work to where it is profitable. It was that or go out of business. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The housing bubble was started from the mandated lending to otherwise unqualified buyers, directed by the government through the Community Reinvestment Act. They must forward the taxes - now as far as them paying none, you're correct in that most companies will not take a hit on profit to pay a levied tax, so that means the price of the product would have to go up. If that company thinks that the new price to pay the new tax would be noncompetitive with, say, a company outside the country not having to pay the tax, they're going to move. No they don't. They have a duty to their shareholders and the customers buying their products. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |