Michelle Bachmann

[Dahoss]

I should know better than to engage someone who spends most of their time here playing fake bets in contest threads. Live and learn.

[dino]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I should know better than to engage someone who spends most of their time here playing fake bets in contest threads. Live and learn.

Yo Dahoss, If you happen to make it out to Saratoga this year drop me a note and we can discuss that circle jerk comment.
Before you start insulting people you don't know just because they disagree with you maybe you need to know that there are some people you can insult for no reason and some you can't. I'm the latter.

[clyde]

Originally Posted by dino

Yo Dahoss, If you happen to make it out to Saratoga this year drop me a note and we can discuss that circle jerk comment.
Before you start insulting people you don't know just because they disagree with you maybe you need to know that there are some people you can insult for no reason and some you can't. I'm the latter.

I may make Sara's Toga this year.




And ah don't like ya.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by clyde

I may make Sara's Toga this year.




And ah don't like ya.

Saratoga would never be the same if you made it.

[clyde]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Saratoga would never be the same if you made it.

!



(They are plying me with money not to come.)

I'd never be the same!

[dino]

Originally Posted by clyde

I may make Sara's Toga this year.




And ah don't like ya.

Big difference between not liking someone and insulting them for no reason. Mind your own business.

[Princess Doreen]

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by dino

Big difference between not liking someone and insulting them for no reason. Mind your own business.

You insulted people for no reason first. Look at your posts. Not sure why an obviously joking comment about a circle jerk has you so mad, but whatever.

In case you haven't noticed, everything and I mean everything that goes on here is Clyde's business.

[Riot]

Here's something scary from those that want to control everyone else's lives:

"States more than double previous record for anti-abortion legislation in 2011"

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/0...011?via=blog_1

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

Here's something scary from those that want to control everyone else's lives:

"States more than double previous record for anti-abortion legislation in 2011"

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/0...011?via=blog_1

Cutting public funding is far different than requiring counceling and or waiting periods or restricting private insurance providers.

A woman should have the absolute right to abort without any barriers. She does not have the right to expect anyone other than the father to pay.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by Riot

Here's something scary from those that want to control everyone else's lives:

"States more than double previous record for anti-abortion legislation in 2011"

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/0...011?via=blog_1

This will never end, while I'd rather see abortions become a thing of the past, forcing extremist views on the majority is not the answer. When both young men and women accept responsibility for their actions, the need for abortions will decrease but until that time, the religious right will continue their "holy war".

[joeydb]

Originally Posted by Riot

Here's something scary from those that want to control everyone else's lives:

"States more than double previous record for anti-abortion legislation in 2011"

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/0...011?via=blog_1

It wouldn't control people lives to end abortion. It would save lives. Abortion is among the most evil of acts in the world, particularly so since the government validates it with false legitimacy.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by dino

Yo Dahoss, If you happen to make it out to Saratoga this year drop me a note and we can discuss that circle jerk comment.
Before you start insulting people you don't know just because they disagree with you maybe you need to know that there are some people you can insult for no reason and some you can't. I'm the latter.

Yo Dino, isn't that what you did tough guy? You insulted people because they disagreed with you. I did it back and you want to fight? Funny stuff.

There have been a lot of internet tough guys here over the years. I'm not impressed by this act.

[lord007]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Yo Dino, isn't that what you did tough guy? You insulted people because they disagreed with you. I did it back and you want to fight? Funny stuff.

There have been a lot of internet tough guys here over the years. I'm not impressed by this act.

Good thing but like Clyde im a lover not a fighter

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by lord007

Good thing but like Clyde im a lover not a fighter

I'm kind of confused. Are you and Dino the same person? You both have responded when I am addressing the other person.

[lord007]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I should know better than to engage someone who spends most of their time here playing fake bets in contest threads. Live and learn.

....it's going to be ok....i love making fake bets...kudos to you and your superior cappin skills

[Danzig]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43733153/ns/politics/

Romney rejects gay marriage pledge


DES MOINES, Iowa — Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's campaign said Tuesday that he will not sign a conservative Iowa Christian group's far-reaching pledge opposing gay marriage, making him the first Republican presidential candidate to reject it.

Two of Romney's rivals for the Republican nomination, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, have signed the The Family Leader's 14-point pledge, which calls on the candidates to denounce same-sex marriage rights, pornography, same-sex military accommodations and forms of Islamic law.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by Danzig

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43733153/ns/politics/

Romney rejects gay marriage pledge


DES MOINES, Iowa — Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's campaign said Tuesday that he will not sign a conservative Iowa Christian group's far-reaching pledge opposing gay marriage, making him the first Republican presidential candidate to reject it.

Two of Romney's rivals for the Republican nomination, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, have signed the The Family Leader's 14-point pledge, which calls on the candidates to denounce same-sex marriage rights, pornography, same-sex military accommodations and forms of Islamic law.

Smart move from the guy who will win the Republican nomination.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by Danzig

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43733153/ns/politics/

Romney rejects gay marriage pledge


DES MOINES, Iowa — Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's campaign said Tuesday that he will not sign a conservative Iowa Christian group's far-reaching pledge opposing gay marriage, making him the first Republican presidential candidate to reject it.

Two of Romney's rivals for the Republican nomination, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, have signed the The Family Leader's 14-point pledge, which calls on the candidates to denounce same-sex marriage rights, pornography, same-sex military accommodations and forms of Islamic law.

I think this was a big mistake by Bachmann, but I guess she has to be consistent with her gay-bashing closet case husband. It's not nearly the wedge issue it once was and you kind of just look like an out-of-touch, crazy dickhead when you do what Bachmann/Santorum did. Romney did what was politically smart, it's not as if Mormons have been very gay-tolerant historically.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

I think this was a big mistake by Bachmann, but I guess she has to be consistent with her gay-bashing closet case husband. It's not nearly the wedge issue it once was and you kind of just look like an out-of-touch, crazy dickhead when you do what Bachmann/Santorum did. Romney did what was politically smart, it's not as if Mormons have been very gay-tolerant historically.

i think they offended several groups with that pledge. the far beyond the pale opening statement regarding black children, and trying to suggest they were 'better off' during slavery...that has got to be one of the single most ridiculous statementsever. but then to suggest a constitutional amendment for marriage-that document isn't supposed to be altered at every whim. the feds think that marriage should be handled on a state by state basis-there's something you don't see much anymore, states handling their own business.

i'm almost hoping palin enters the race, she and bachmann could split that vote, and leave the nomination to be won by someone with more sense.


i would love to be able to ask anyone signing that pledge how they feel that move squares with being the party of 'less government'. doesn't less govt mean staying out of peoples' personal lives?