|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
10-25-2006, 09:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"Originally Posted by Cunningham Racing
Just remember where I used to work....this is not second hand....." You should do some research on your sources if you are going to be quoting them..... Undefeated Grade I Winner Vacare to Skip Breeders' Cup Date Posted: 10/23/2006 8:36:07 PM Last Updated: 10/24/2006 8:59:24 PM Vacare, winning the Queen Elizabeth II Challenge Cup, will bypass the Breeders' Cup. (Edited DAK Productions release) After much deliberation, owner Robert L. Lothenbach decided against pre-entering his prized 3-year-old turf filly Vacare in the Breeders' Cup Filly and Mare Turf (gr. IT). Vacare, who was last seen winning the grade I Queen Elizabeth II Challenge Cup over the Keeneland green on Oct. 14, is perfect from four starts. She also counts the Grade III Pucker Up Stakes at Arlington among her victories. "There will several reasons we decided against it (the Breeders' Cup)," said trainer Chris Block. "The competition jump off short (three weeks) rest, the additional distance (11 furlongs versus nine), and the fact that her schedule did not revolve around the Breeders' Cup this year were the mitigating factors. Heck, in June she was an unraced maiden." Vacare is catalogued in the Fasig-Tipton Kentucky Fall Mixed sale to be held in Lexington on Sunday, Nov. 5, the day after Breeders' Cup. She is consigned by Chesapeake Farm of Drew Nardiello. "She would have to be a prime prospect for a potential buyer," Block said. "She's fresh, isn't overraced, and with several of the top females in the division likely to retire, she could quickly become one of the new stars. Mr. Lothenbach will set a reserve, and if it is not met, it will be a pleasure for us to campaign her next year." 
|
|
#2
10-25-2006, 11:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If what I know to be Insider info is going to always get this sort of negative reaction then I'll just keep it to myself going forward. I thought many of you would enjoy it, but I guess the reality is that it is probably not beneficial to post it. Last edited by Cunningham Racing : 10-25-2006 at 11:17 AM.
|
|
#4
10-25-2006, 11:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Hey, obviously it was not on key and I figured there would be differences, which adds to the question of why it was taken down originally anyway.... Like I said Scav, I'll back off.....you can read about stuff the next day in the paper...
|
|
#5
10-25-2006, 11:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Being all tough, "JUST remember where I worked, this is not 2nd hand" So comical. At least if you are going to try to sound smart, be correct.
|
|
#6
10-25-2006, 11:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Excuse me for interrupting, but I read the original thread last night and NOWHERE in the thread did he state that this was OFFICIAL. Get over it...
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/cajungator26
|
|
#7
10-25-2006, 11:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
My explanation of where I worked was just to answer your question of my ability to source the list.....by stating that it was not second hand, I referred to the fact that I didn't get it from a news source - ie: "the wire" - I got the information myself - just like 'the wire' attempted to do..... Their lists were not totally accurate either, Scavs....but nobodys ever are until it is released. You are supposed to take it for what its worth, but I should have known there would be the unappreciative kind......I'll refrain going forward.... 
|
Hybrid Mode
