BEYER: Crown thriving but tinkering could be in order

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by Travis Stone

I'm speaking from direct experience. When the Super Derby undercard features a name - a horse, trainer... you name it - the card does better from a business standpoint. The more names you have, the more people feel comfortable playing the signal, and thus the better it does.

If the Preakness undercard was for MD-bred horses only, would it do as well? Definitely not. Would people turn on the signal before the Preakness? Doubtful. Big undercards help. Fact.

Now, do horsemen love it? No. But horsemen do love the exposure the track gets, and it does nothing but help the track long term, definitely not hurt.

I understand what you are saying and I'm not saying you're wrong and I'm right cause I don't know. From the outside looking in, it just seems to me that the horsemen would be upset. I also understand how business is helped on that day I just don't see how it really helps the horsemen or the track long term. It sort of strikes me the same way the whole Zenyatta thing did. She was good for the sport on the days she ran but how many of those screaming little girls that came out on those days are going to remain as fans once she's retired? How much long term good did she really do?