![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
With a small and relatively fixed pool of horses it's alway tough in So. Cal. The last 2-3 years have been brutal and honestly I find it gets boring to see the same horses taking turns.
I wonder how many races they'll card per day? They may have to cut back on some of the extended cards on big days.
__________________
RIP Monroe. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Personally I think the 12-13 race cards are overkill. I love to play the races and attend the races but when I print out 60+ pages of PP's it just starts to look like WORK. I understand that tracks like to do this on big days when their are plenty of fannies in the seats but it poaches too many useful midweek races. A couple of races that looks like garbage on the Belmont or Derby undercard could be the centerpiece of a decent midweek program.
If they have a major stake and 3 or 4 supporting stakes and maybe a decent little overnight stake, they they need only fill 4 or 5 to have a nice 10 race card. As someone who plays follows racing daily, I hate that the weekdays leading up to the biggest days are often especially weak to set up a big day.
__________________
RIP Monroe. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Seems like 9 races is plenty although I am not familiar with the economics of making the cards.
__________________
Tom Cooley photo |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
When attention is on the signal, and people are in the building, you milk it for all its worth, even if it makes one less allowance race on a Thursday.
Quality does not play a significant role in handle.... field size does. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I fully agree Travis and understand why they do it, but in the case of a DM where they are struggling to fill cards at all, passing on "supercards" might make sense. At DM and SAR they get bodies in the place every Saturday anyhow.
__________________
RIP Monroe. |