![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
They had a test run with the BC last year. It's a bad idea.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bc wasn't prime time
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Eh, I'm against it. Nighttime racing is nice as a change of pace, but the vast majority of top racing in Amerca is conducted during the day and the Derby has been a day race for 140 years, so I don't like the idea of messing with the late afternoon post. Plus, as h_i_g said, I doubt it'll make it more of a viewing event.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think an evening post would help ratings and wagering similarly to the Saturday of Final Four Weekend. A lot of people would have groups of friends over to watch and I think more people may be introduced to betting. With computer betting it is so easy to set up an account I think it would introduce more people to wagering.
I have had a few afternoon Derby cookouts over the years and everyone wanted some action even if they had never wagered before. Many people had to show up after later or after the race because they or their kids were involved in Saturday baseball, soccer, golf etc....... That is why prime time or early evening would make more sense. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think a "twilight" Derby is definitely going to happen in the next few years. Now, whether a 7:38 post is "primetime" or not is another discussion.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
"If it ain't broke don't fix it."
The Kentucky Derby model is far from broken, in my opinion. It should remain as it is. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agreed that's it's not broken, but is there a chance of making it better?
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |