![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Huh? That's exactly what I said you did. I used the figure 16.83% for what you gave Pool 2's "All Others". I wrote: Quote:
I don't have any reason to think that you've capped your five Pool 2 field horses incorrectly. So I attributed the shortfall to what you called "The Rest", suggesting that 10-15% would be a better fig than 5%. (That would have brought the total chance for the Pool 2 Field up to around 22-27%.) I shoulld more broadly have written that somewhere among your five Pool 2 field horses AND "The Rest" there is a 5-10% shortfall predicted by the number and quality of Pool 2 "All Others" horses that have made it to the Derby starting gate the past 11 years. There are 300+ horses nominated to the TC. Some that are obscure at the time of past Future Wagers have suddenly become major players in the Derby. It's hard to put a figure on the Field's chances any other way than looking at historical data. I'm sure someone else could look at it differently, but I feel pretty confident in the way I'm looking at it. --Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson |