![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
They reported it on the news as private property. They said authorities questioned the owner of the land but was cleared. I can definitely see a case in which the owner of the property became upset over the amount of dog $hit on his land and decided to do something about it, albeit the wrong way.
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
States laws differ, of course. I know of two cases in Kentucky where owners set poisoning traps (both used antifreeze) out on their own suburban land (their backyards) to kill free roaming dogs and cats that were coming onto their property. One went to jail, one paid big fines. Not something you can do on a whim. When we hunt out west on private land (with permission), you have to be careful of the dogs as they will lace carcasses with different (legal) poisons to kill coyotes. But there are poisons they can't use (yes, there are laws). The case in discussion reminds me of a poison that's no longer legally available - some farmers still have some left over in sheds.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |