![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
It is an interesting editorial, and he does make an important point. However, doesn't the figure get a whole lot easier to make when the two races before that on the card were also 6f dirt races....as was the 5th race, which was a stake featuring several veteran horses?
I was also confused by the fact that he pointed to blinkers as a possible reason that the 6th place finisher improved....even though that horse's assigned speed figure was actually one point lower than in his previous start. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Watchmaker's getting far too much credit with you using the word "interesting" to describe anything he writes.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, you both have good points.
I thought his discussion of the horse that went backwards was weird. And Nick, the interesting thing was that he even wrote that in the first place. I saw another blooper in another editorial there today as well, speaking of mistakes. It was Hovdeys piece about the San Luis Obispo just run last week. He mentioned Bien Bien giving Fraise all he could handle in the Hollywood Derby, when it was Paradise Creek that beat Bien Bien. That was the single most annoying day at the races I've ever had. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Of course, he failed to mention that Bien Bien only won the Hollywood Turf Cup on the disqualification of Fraise. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's a silly piece of writing. I've heard the Remsen figure being questioned before Mucho Macho Man won last weekend - you had like four 9f dirt races that day and consistant weather. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |